Turning Hindu's Religious Texts into Mythology
Dear Poonam,
I read your article about some 'Ashok Banker' in today's brunch. Nothing out of ordinary here. But one line caught my attention, " to get his first mythology series (the Ramayana) published"
I am appalled at the ease with which you have converted the Hindu's religious texts into mythology.
If you refer the dictionary.com one of the definitions of mythology is "a set of stories, traditions, or beliefs associated with a particular group or the history of an event, arising naturally or deliberately fostered"
The line above conveys the meaning which you are implying to Hindu's sacred texts, that they are bunkum/untrue/lies/fabricated etc. This exactly is the stand which marauding English/British took when they were trying to proselytise Hindu's under their domination. Is it something to do with your education in St. Stephen's? To be-little/falsify the core of the essence of the Hindu religion. While you have sold your soul, you have no right to propagate the same & etch on the impressionable minds of young Hindu's who might be reading/referring to this article in 'Brunch'
Asides, one direct question. Do you have the gumption to use the term mythology while describing texts like 'Bible' & 'Quran'. If not, have you ever thought/wondered why is this so?
The answer is violence. You would be scared of the protests from church/christian world & violence from the Moslem fraternity. But when it comes to Hindu's you (or for that matter the fat smug Ashok Banker) have none of these fears. You take comfort in the fact that for thousand's of years Hindu's have taken pile of shit ...few from you will not make matters any difficult
However, you would do well to remember that things change over time & this attitude of Hindu's will change too.
You are today in a strong position, a position to influence few minds....my request is to use this position responsibly. Pls don't have this flippant attitude...Use the words carefully, Don't tread on people's emotions for it can come back & haunt you.
Thanks
I read your article about some 'Ashok Banker' in today's brunch. Nothing out of ordinary here. But one line caught my attention, " to get his first mythology series (the Ramayana) published"
I am appalled at the ease with which you have converted the Hindu's religious texts into mythology.
If you refer the dictionary.com one of the definitions of mythology is "a set of stories, traditions, or beliefs associated with a particular group or the history of an event, arising naturally or deliberately fostered"
The line above conveys the meaning which you are implying to Hindu's sacred texts, that they are bunkum/untrue/lies/fabricated etc. This exactly is the stand which marauding English/British took when they were trying to proselytise Hindu's under their domination. Is it something to do with your education in St. Stephen's? To be-little/falsify the core of the essence of the Hindu religion. While you have sold your soul, you have no right to propagate the same & etch on the impressionable minds of young Hindu's who might be reading/referring to this article in 'Brunch'
Asides, one direct question. Do you have the gumption to use the term mythology while describing texts like 'Bible' & 'Quran'. If not, have you ever thought/wondered why is this so?
The answer is violence. You would be scared of the protests from church/christian world & violence from the Moslem fraternity. But when it comes to Hindu's you (or for that matter the fat smug Ashok Banker) have none of these fears. You take comfort in the fact that for thousand's of years Hindu's have taken pile of shit ...few from you will not make matters any difficult
However, you would do well to remember that things change over time & this attitude of Hindu's will change too.
You are today in a strong position, a position to influence few minds....my request is to use this position responsibly. Pls don't have this flippant attitude...Use the words carefully, Don't tread on people's emotions for it can come back & haunt you.
Thanks